Ask our AI-chatbot
Planned

Large Interdisciplinary Researcher Project

Important dates

22 Jan 2025

Open for applications

05 Mar 2025

Application deadline

01 Oct 2025

Earliest permitted project start

01 Apr 2026

Latest permitted project start

31 Mar 2032

Latest permitted project completion date

Important dates

Purpose

The purpose is to move the research front in climate and nature risk – effects, consequences and solutions for society through interdisciplinary projects with larger allocations. We support researchers from different disciplines who together will generate new knowledge that would not have been possible to achieve without interdisciplinary collaboration. Applicants must have demonstrated the ability to conduct research of high scientific quality.

About the call for proposals

Our aim is to stimulate research collaboration that will solve challenges that require interdisciplinarity. By interdisciplinarity, we mean that the researchers in the project must represent two or more different subject groups as defined at level 2 of  the Norwegian Division into Scientific Disciplines (in Norwegian only) (PDF, opens in a new window), prepared by the Norwegian Council for Higher Education (UHR).   

In addition to this call, we have four others with a deadline 5 March that are aimed at research organisations. A total of five calls are the three thematic Researcher Project calls (Researcher Project for Early Careers, Large Interdisciplinary Researcher Project (this call) and Researcher Project for Scientific Renewal) and the two calls for Collaborative and Knowledge-building Projects (Knowledge-building Projects for Industry and Collaborative Projects to Meet Societal and Industry-related Challenges). In the thematic texts of this call, you will find information on which of the other calls may be relevant to the individual topic.  

We therefore recommend that you also read through any other relevant calls to see which one is most suitable for your project. Please note that we do not move applications between the calls, and that it is therefore important to apply to the correct call. 

Please also note that you can only be the project manager for one application for this and our four other March calls. This restriction does not apply to FRIPRO's open-ended calls for proposals.

You can create an application and fill in the application form from 22 January. 

The call is available in both Norwegian and English. The text of the Norwegian call for proposals is legally binding. 

We reserve the right to make changes to the call after we have received the letter of allocation for 2025. 

Who is eligible to apply?

Only approved Norwegian research organisations are eligible to apply. See the list of approved research organisations

Who can participate in the project?

Requirements relating to the Project Owner 

The research organisation listed as the Project Owner in the application form must have approved the submission of the application to the Research Council. 

Requirements relating to the project manager 

You must have an approved doctoral degree or equivalent before the application deadline. 

If you do not have an approved doctoral degree, but have associate professor qualifications or employment as a researcher 1, researcher 2 or senior researcher in the institute sector or in a health trust, you can also apply. 

Requirements relating to partners 

The projects must be interdisciplinary and include collaboration between researchers from different disciplines. If the collaboration is between researchers at different institutions, the institutions must be listed as partners. For partners, the following applies: 

Only approved Norwegian research organisations (see "Who is eligible to apply?" above) or equivalent research organisations in other countries may be partners and receive funding for a Researcher Project. 

Other types of organisations, including companies and other enterprises, may not be partners in research projects. 

Read more about partners.  

As the Project Owner or partner in the project, you can engage subcontractors to deliver services and contribute to the implementation of certain tasks in the project. Subcontractors cannot be given rights to project results. Organisations that are subject to the regulations for public procurement must in the usual way carry out the selection of subcontractors in line with these regulations. You cannot have R&D suppliers in the project. 

One and the same actor cannot have two different roles in the project. This means that a subcontractor cannot be the Project Owner or a partner in the project at the same time. 

What can you seek funding for?

You can apply for funding to cover the actual costs necessary to carry out the project. The Project Owner must obtain information on costs from the partners in the project. These costs must be entered in the cost plan under the cost type to which they belong. 

We require that you break down the project budget into the following cost types in your application: 

  • Payroll and indirect costs, which relates to researcher time (including research fellowship positions and the project manager's position) at the research organisations participating in the project. For doctoral scholarships, the support is limited to three full-time equivalents. For postdoctoral fellowships, the support is limited to a minimum of three years and a maximum of four years. See also the Regulations relating to terms of employment for positions such as postdoctoral fellow, research fellow, research assistant and specialist candidate (in Norwegian only).  
  • Equipment, which includes operating and depreciation costs for scientific equipment and research infrastructure necessary to carry out the project.  
  • Other operating expenses, which are expenses for other activities necessary to carry out the project's R&D activities. Any purchases from subcontractors must be entered here, and if the purchase is more than NOK 100,000, it must be specified, otherwise all costs you enter as "other operating expenses" must be specified in the application.  

The item Procurement of R&D services cannot be used.  

If doctoral and postdoctoral research fellows are included in the project and there are specific plans for them to stay abroad, this may be included in the application. The Research Council also has a separate call for proposals for research stays abroad for doctoral and post-doctoral research fellows. Please note that the separate call for proposals has a number of requirements for who can receive support for the stay abroad. 

If there are specific plans for visiting researchers or stays abroad for researchers in the project, this may be included in the application. The rules for such stays and information about rates can be found on the budget information page (see link below). 

You will find detailed and important information on the website about what to enter in the project budget.

Scope of funding 

Funding of NOK 12–25 million per project is available under this call. 

We do not require that you provide own funding. However, if our lump sum rates do not cover all costs for recruitment positions in the university and university college or institute sector or for research positions in the university and university college sector, we assume that you cover the difference with your own funding. For research positions in the institute sector, you must use the reported hourly rates. 

Ethics 

The Research Council requires a high standard of research ethics in the projects we fund, and ethics is included in the assessment criterion for Research Quality. In the template for the project description, there is a separate section that deals with this. The description of ethics is first and foremost an assurance to the peers that there is a plan in place to deal with the most important ethical dilemmas in the project. If you need to describe this in more detail, this can be done elsewhere in the project description, for example under method selection, or you can do so in the data management plan(s) (see below). 

The responsibility for compliance with the research ethics standard lies with the individual researcher and research institution (cf.  The Act on the Organisation of Research Ethics). The panel's assessment and the Research Council's decision on funding do not entail any research ethics approval. 

Conditions for funding 

We do not award state aid under this call. This means that the funding should only go to their non-economic activity. We assume that the necessary accounting separation is in place. Our conditions for awarding and disbursing support for the first year, and any commitments and payments for subsequent years, can be found in our general terms and conditions for R&D projects on the information page What the contract consists of.  

If you are granted the project, the following must be in place when you revise the application: 

Relevant thematic areas for this call

The topics in this call are grouped into the thematic areas below. The topics contain special requirements and guidelines that will be emphasised in the assessment of the application.

Climate and the environment

Climate and nature risks

Practical information

Requirements for this application type

The application must be created and submitted via My RCN Web. You can change and submit the application several times until the application deadline. We recommend that you submit your application as soon as you have completed the application form and uploaded the required attachments. When the application deadline expires, it is the version of the application that was submitted most recently that we process. 

The application must meet the following requirements: 

  • The application and all attachments must be written in English, with the exception of the description of relevance to the topic, which you can write in Norwegian or English. 
  • All attachments must be in PDF format. 
  • Mandatory attachments must be included. 
  • Requirements relating to the Project Manager and the Project Owner must be met. 
  • The project must start between 1 October 2025 and 1 April 2026. 
  • You must clearly demonstrate that the project is within the priorities described in the topic from which you are applying for funding. 

The application may be rejected if it does not meet the requirements in the list above. 

Mandatory attachments 

  • Project description 
  • CV for the project manager 
  • description of relevance to the topic 

Applications that do not meet the requirements above will be rejected. You must use standard templates for all required attachments. The templates can be found at the bottom of the call. 

Optional attachments 

  • CVs for the most important project participants, each of a maximum of four pages. It is mandatory to use the CV template at the bottom of the call. 
    • You may assess which project participants are the most important, and in which cases it will be of importance for the application processing to assess the project participants' qualifications. 
  • If you wish, you can attach a brief description of competence or suggestions for up to three peers you believe would be suitable to assess your application. We are not obliged to use the suggestions, but can use them if necessary. 

All attachments to the application must be submitted with the application. We do not accept attachments submitted after the application deadline unless we have requested additional documentation. 

We will not consider documents and links to websites in the application, or attachments other than those specified above. Be careful to upload the correct attachment type, as there are no technical restrictions on what kind of templates it is possible to upload in the application form. 

Assessment criteria

Applications will be assessed in light of the purpose of the call and the following criteria: 

Excellence – potential for advancing the state-of-the-art

The extent to which the proposed work is ambitious, novel, and goes beyond the state-of-the-art
• Scientific creativity and originality.
• Novelty and boldness of hypotheses or research questions.
• Potential for development of new knowledge beyond the current state-of-the-art, including significant theoretical, methodological, experimental or empirical advancement.

Excellence – quality of R&D activities

The quality of the proposed R&D activities
• Quality of the research questions, hypotheses and project objectives, and the extent to which they are clearly and adequately specified.
• Credibility and appropriateness of the theoretical approach, research design and use of scientific methods. Appropriate consideration of interdisciplinary approaches.
• The extent to which appropriate consideration has been given to ethical issues, safety issues, gender dimension in research content, and use of stakeholder/user knowledge if appropriate.

Impact

Potential impact of the proposed research
• Potential for academic impact:
The extent to which the planned outputs of the project address important present and/or future scientific challenges.
The extent to which the planned outputs are openly accessible to ensure reusability of the research outputs and enhance reproducibility.
• Potential for societal impact (if addressed by the applicant):
The extent to which the planned outputs of the project address UN Sustainable Development Goals or other important present and/or future societal challenges.
• The extent to which the potential impacts are clearly formulated and plausible.

Communication and exploitation
• The extent to which the appropriate open science practices are implemented as an integral part of the proposed project to ensure open sharing and wide distribution of research outputs.
• Quality and scope of communication and engagement activities with different target audiences, including relevant stakeholders/users.

Implementation

The quality of the project manager and project group
• The extent to which the project manager has relevant expertise and experience, and demonstrated ability to perform high-quality research (as appropriate to the career stage).
• The degree of complementarity of the participants and the extent to which the project group has the necessary expertise needed to undertake the research effectively.

The quality of the project organisation and management
• Effectiveness of the project organisation, including the extent to which resources assigned to work packages are aligned with project objectives and deliverables.
• Appropriateness of the allocation of tasks, ensuring that all participants have a valid role and adequate resources in the project to fulfil that role.
• Appropriateness of the proposed management structures and governance.

Relevance to the chosen topic

• The extent to which the project satisfies the thematic orientation described in the text for the chosen topic.
• The extent to which the project satisfies any other priorities in the text for the chosen topic.

Administrative procedures

We will assess your application as it has been submitted. It is not relevant how an identical or approximately similar application has previously been assessed by us. 

Here you can read more about the processing procedure for Researcher Projects

Once the application deadline has passed, we will first check that all formal requirements are met. Applications that do not satisfy the formal requirements will be rejected. 

Applications that are outside the thematic limitations set out in the call will not be eligible for funding. Decisions on this are made by the individual portfolio boards. 

Where the requirements are met, we will make the application, with all mandatory attachments, available in an online portal for referees who individually assess the criteria Research quality – potential for advancing the research frontier, Research quality – quality in R&D activities, Impacts and Implementation. The referees will then meet in thematic panels where they will reach a consensus assessment of the application for each of the four criteria.   

The referees assess the applications for open research practice as part of the criterion Impact. On this website, you will find more information about the assessment of open science in grant applications.  

If the panel assesses all criteria for a mark of 5 or higher, the application will also be assessed on the basis of the criterion Relevance to the topic by Research Council case officers.  

The assessment of the five above criteria is summarised in an overall mark for the application. The Research Council's administration then creates ranking lists based on this grade. 

Finally, it is the portfolio boards that decide whether the applications will receive funding or not. Their decisions are based on the ranking lists and an overall portfolio assessment. 

On this website you will find more information about portfolio valuation  

Messages at time of print 21 December 2024, 17:05 CET

No global messages displayed at time of print.